Think
Saturday, September 24th, 2005(Note: Originally entitled, What Could Have Been, the Weekly Sillimanian, August 10, 2005)
Think
Ma. Zusabel R. Digaum
Silver Lining
“There are two things to remember: I will not die on you and I will continue fighting. And if I die, I will continue fighting with your help. The Philippines needs a choice. We will be there. Tell it to the wind, I’m not quitting.”
–Raul S. Roco
He may have been “the best president this country never had.” No doubt about it.
Former Senator Raul Roco, champion of women’s rights and causes, father of Central Bank, and an “honorary woman,” left many Filipinos speculating what could have beens and what could have nots if he were elected president of our dear old Philippines in the now-controversial 2004 elections.
He succumbed to heart failure due to complications of cancer Friday last week.
Messages have started flooding in, with many politicians describing his greatness and enumerating all the great deeds he had done. But one fact remains unchanged: our country has lost one of her great men. As the Philippine Daily Inquirer straightforwardly put it, “eulogies are wasted on the dead.”
Roco may not have been our president but he had served our country more satisfactorily than most of our so-called government leaders and traditional politicians have. He may not have reached full stardom status in Philippine politics but he had shown the greatest heights of true service and leadership. His electoral campaign may have lost its luster when his prostate cancer recurred, but he had offered us a platform of hope. He may be dead now but his death has left two choices: to continue plunging down and bask in hopelessness; or to start rising up and make ourselves our own hope, just as he had lived his life.
Somebody told me that we will never learn to appreciate the importance of certain persons and things in life unless they are gone. She found it ironic that most of us have only realized the greatness of Roco, now that he has departed. Maybe, she suggested her assumption, we deserve the leaders we have and the sorry state we are in because we were either too idiotic or too scared to make a difference. Roco was too good for us.
I share her sentiments. I could still remember the presidential elections of 2004, the first electoral process my sister and I were to participate in. Although there were a handful of people who were in favor of Raul Roco then, they were outnumbered by those who favored the other two leading presidential contenders. Later on, we learned that most of our friends and acquaintances had changed their presidential bets, to save, according to them, our country from the hands of an actor inexperienced in the affairs of the state. Upon learning this, my parents imparted us one of the best advices in our lives: stand firm, do not settle for mediocrity. If we want the best for our country, they said, we have to vote the best candidate. They were then referring to Raul Roco as the best candidate, and GMA as the mediocre one.
In that election, I learned one thing common in our culture: compromise. Whether at home, work, or in school, in the Senate or in Congress, and in the voting precincts, most of us are too scared to stand by the truth, to make our own position. We go with the flow. We like to think what the majority thinks. Either we’re too scared or too stupid to use our brains.
But Raul Roco chose to make a difference. He was not scared. He was not stupid. He did not compromise his principles to advance his position in the government or make a shortcut route to the presidency. His voice did not falter nor waver in any issue he decides to tackle.
Joker Arroyo said it best: He sought to combine his idealism with politics, a difficult combination, compromise being the hallmark of politics. He was uncompromising in his resistance to separate the two. That was his virtue as a true leader, his failing as a politician.
Conrado de Quiros described him this way: He was a decent politician in an occupation grown more indecent over the years, he was a principled lawyer in a country grown more lawless over the years, he was an honorable man in a world where honor sold more cheaply than DVDs in Quiapo.
Today, I am now left with fond memories of my man—Raul Roco, in his signature Hawaiian shirt, waving and standing firm—the man whose strong principles ignited hope in the youth; the man whose strong vision rekindled the spirit of honesty in the world of cheating politicians.
Too bad he is now gone. Too bad he could no longer lead us, when those who have turned deaf to him have now realized the truth of his voice.
But death is not the end of it all. We can forever wallow in what could have beens, what could have nots, and what ifs, and leave this great man’s soul desperate. His death is a painful lesson but we should learn from it.
Never compromise. Never settle for mediocrity. Think wisely. Always hope for the best. Idealism is what our country needs.
Ninoy Aquino said that we are worth dying for. Raul Roco asked for our help, even in his death. Are we going to wait for another great man to die to move us to help ourselves?
Think.